3GPP TS V () Technical Specification 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Net. C_REC#3: The cellular host must comply with the behavior defined in [TS] [TS] [TS] for requesting a PDP- Context type. File Name: pycrate_mobile/ # * Created: 3GPP TS Mobile radio interface layer 3 specification. # release 13 (d90).
|Published (Last):||2 November 2007|
|PDF File Size:||14.42 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.71 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Operator X can be operator A, B, or C, or none of them. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. The deferred address allocation is based on the use of DHCPv4 as well as appropriate UE-side implementation- dependent triggers to invoke the protocol. The RFC Editor has chosen to publish this document at its 3ggpp and makes no statement about its value for implementation or deployment. Because of this diversity of terminals, it is necessary to define a set of IPv6 functionalities valid for any node directly connecting to a 3GPP 240008 network.
Concretely, this document lists means to ensure 3g;p service over an IPv6-only connectivity given the adoption rate of this model by mobile operators. The basic EPS architecture is illustrated in Figure 4. Obviously, in order for the roaming to work properly, the operators have to agree on supported protocol versions so that the visited network does not, for example, unnecessarily drop user-plane IPv6 traffic.
WSFD-110115 Network Share (GWCN) for LTE
IPv4 session establishment initiated from hosts located on the LAN segment side and destined for IPv4 nodes must be maintained. Operators that have 240088 networks based on 3rd Generation Partnership Project 3GPP network architectures are facing IPv4 address shortages at the Internet registries and are feeling pressure to migrate to IPv6. For example, you might activate tethering on an iPhone and use your mobile data on a connected laptop. Other types of configurations are not standardized.
IPv6 in 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Evolved Packet System (EPS)
Figure 3 Handover Procedure. As devices ta applications are upgraded to support IPv6, they can start leveraging the IPv6 connectivity provided by the networks while maintaining the ability to fall back to IPv4. For more information on the 3GPP release details, the reader may refer to Section 6. Avoiding soliciting ALGs makes it easier to develop a service without any adherence with the underlying transport network.
Medias this blog was made to help people to easily download or read PDF files. This is necessary because a device may have multiple PDP contexts and application endpoints. Both mobile hosts and mobile devices with the capability to share their 3GPP mobile connectivity are in scope.
The impact of keepalive messages would be more severe if multiple applications are issuing those messages e. Note, this profile does not require IPv4 service continuity techniques listed in Section 4. Multiple carriers use the same set of devices, which reduces their costs. In the light of recent IPv6 production deployments, additional features to facilitate IPv6-only deployments while accessing IPv4-only services should be considered. These recommendations apply for mobile hosts, including mobile devices.
This will also ensure that legacy devices and applications continue to work with no impact. This implies that the shorter ‘delegated prefix’ cannot be given to the requesting router i. An operator may also te gateways that do not provide Internet connectivity but rather provide connectivity to a closed network providing a set of the operator’s own services.
heise Netze – IPv6 in 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Evolved Packet System (EPS)
If the cellular host receives the 33gpp information in several channels for the same interface, the following preference order must be followed: The same also applies when the modem part of the UE does not have exact knowledge of whether the UE operating system IP stack is dual-stack capable or not. However, IPv6 deployment in commercial networks remains low.
Impact on the System None. A UE can be attached to one or more gateways simultaneously. Acknowledgements Rs thanks to C. Operators with large subscriber bases have multiple gateways, and hence the same [ RFC ] IPv4 address space can be reused across gateways.
Help operators with the detailed device requirement list preparation to be exchanged with device suppliers. You could perhaps use deep-packet inspection to search out 2. Moreover, this profile also covers cellular CE routers that are used in various mobile broadband deployments. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document.
Tracking a host is still possible based on the first 64 bits of the IPv6 address. This document is structured to provide the generic IPv6 recommendations that are valid for all nodes, whatever their function e. This section discusses a few additional security concerns to take into consideration. IPv4 service continuity features are listed in this section because these are critical for operators with an IPv6-only deployment model.
3gppp, modern CE routers are designed with advanced functions such as link aggregation that consists in optimizing the network usage by aggregating the connectivity resources offered via various interfaces e.
DHCPv6 The purpose of this recommendation is to guarantee for a deterministic behavior to be followed by all cellular hosts when the DNS information is received in various channels. Some of the issues and concerns with respect fs deployment and shortage of private IPv4 addresses within a single network domain are also discussed.
The number of UEs that a gateway supports is on the order of 1 to 10 million. Table of Contents 1.
Haeffner Date May Format: GMM result depending upon which domain has been authenticated of Success. In addition to operating dual- stack networks during the transition from IPv4 to IPv6, the two alternative categories for the transition are encapsulation and translation. The above rules essentially imply that the network migration has to be planned and subscriptions provisioned 24008 on the lowest common denominator, if inter-RAT handovers are desired.