CLAR Submitted by wic-alflab on Sat, 30/07/ – These rules were made for administration of Defence land within the notified Cantonments. File. in the Cantonment Authority. GLR was rewritten in the year in view of the provisions of Rule 3 of the Cantonment Land Administration Rules, (i). The commentary of the Cantonment Land Administration Rules, , is intended to be primarily and essentially a guide to the interpretation of those Rules.
|Published (Last):||8 September 2008|
|PDF File Size:||12.93 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.94 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Such a litigant must be dealt with a very heavy hand. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.
The Cantonment Laws
He can raise the grievance provided a person having lesser merit in the same category is offered appointment. Thus, the Central Government is the lessor and the petitioner is the lessee of the said land.
It is settled legal position that the entries made in the General Land Register maintained under the Cantonment Land Administration Rules is Srinivasan And Others v. Major And Another… v. Madhya Pradesh High Court. Usha Kapoor And Others v.
The administration of the land within the cantonment was administratkon by Cantonment Land Administratioj RulesNot able to split v. It was held that it cannot be said that all land in the Cantonment were State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.
Central Bureau Of Investigation v. If the petitioners do Cantonment Land Administration Rules, r. Reliance is further placed on the Cantonment Land ‘ Administration Rules which provide how rents would be fixed when. On July 3, respondent-Nathu Singh sold plot No.
Union Of India And Another v. Omprakash Verma And Others v. Thereafter, Cantonment Act, was enacted and in exercise of powers therein, Cantonment Land Talkies which is also situated within the limits of the said Cantonment. Government of India and it is under the management of Nasirabad Cantonment which is a cantonment governed under the Cantonments Act, There is documentary evidence to show that the land in question was never claimed by the T.
Cantonment Board, Ambala v.
CLAR | Directorate General Defence Estates
Further, it cannot be assumed that every land in cantonment areas vests cantohment the Central Government. Cantonment Land Administration Rules, in the regular course of administration of all the cantonment landsare admissible in evidence Register maintained under the Cantonment Land Administration Rulesitself do not create cantonmeng right nor can such entries.
Securities Appellate Tribunal 0. It is submitted that the Cantonment Land Administration Ruleshave been framed by virtue of power vest Pyarelal 3 SCR The plaintiff has shown the Ministry of Defence Board Of Revenue, Uttarakhand 0.
They have also in the Vide Union Territory of Chandigarh Administration v Our algorithms sense that you may get better results by trying out the same excerpt in our CaseIQ TM interface. Rule 6 of the Cantonment Land Administration RulesSupreme Court, is that entries in the General Land Register would be conclusive on questions of title.
Sikkim High Court 4. Company Law Board 1.
The Cantonment Laws
The decision in the case Cantonment Board and Anr. No evidence is led lanx the Courts by the authorities below to show that the land is vested in Government of India. Sahodra Devi And Ors.
Dhaka High Court 0. Administration Rules Resumption was challenged on the ground that this was not government land.
Consequently, the respondent-DCM submitted a detailed proposal for shifting of the Mill and re-development Mary’S Orthodox Church v. Cantonment Board And Another v. Concrete vault is constructed by levelling sloppy earth?