There are many different terms that Derrida employs Logocentrism emphasises the privileged role that. Derrida’s logocentrism approach challenges the privileging of speech article, these ideas of Derrida are applied by reading the Logos in the. Logocentrism: deconstruction: Deconstruction in philosophy: a manifestation of the “logocentrism” of Western culture—i.e., the general assumption that there is.

Author: Tum Malazilkree
Country: Republic of Macedonia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Art
Published (Last): 27 November 2016
Pages: 216
PDF File Size: 18.61 Mb
ePub File Size: 14.52 Mb
ISBN: 380-3-89661-551-1
Downloads: 17183
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Shale

According to Derrida then, metaphysics involves installing hierarchies and orders of subordination in the various dualisms that it encounters M But as Derrida points out, putting signs or words as the centre of a system is inherently flawed. That said, certain defining features of deconstruction can be noticed.

Indeed, Derrida explicitly argues that when we know anything of the other, or even understand their motivation in however minimal a way, this absolute forgiveness can no longer take place OCF While Derrida would resist any reductive understanding of his work based upon his biographical life, it could be argued that these kind of experiences played a large role in his insistence upon the importance of the marginal, and the other, in his later thought.

Any explanatory words that Derrida may offer would themselves require further explanation.

Derrida and the deconstruction of Logocentrism « haphazard academia

It follows from this that unconditional hospitality, or we might say ‘impossible’ hospitality, hence involves a relinquishing of judgement and control in regard to who will receive that hospitality.

This kind of assumption relies on the forced closure of structures, a closure which will produce a tendency towards positive truth olgocentrism. Of course, it might be objected that even if it is psychologically difficult to give without also receiving and in a manner that is tantamount to taking this does not in-itself constitute a refutation of the logic of genuine giving.


Even when the Messiah is ‘there’, he or she must still be yet to come, and this brings us back to the distinction between the messianic and the various historical messianisms. Against the metaphysics of presence, deconstruction brings a non concept called differance.

According to Derrida, the trace itself does not exist because it is self-effacing. Such deliberations can give us valuable, problematizing insights into the goals of metaphysical thinking in the history of Western philosophy.

Jacques Derrida (1930—2004)

Nothing would be more antithetical to verrida stated intent than this attempt at defining it through the decidedly metaphysical question “what is deconstruction? Derrida can offer no resolution in regard to the impasse that obtains between these two notions between possible and impossible forgiving, between an amnesty where apologies are asked for and a more absolute forgiveness. In fact, he either logoentrism from, or was forced out of at least two schools during his childhood simply on account of being Jewish.

Kamuf et al, Stanford: He hence moved from Algiers to France, and soon after he also began to play a major role in the leftist journal Tel Quel.

Derrida, Jacques | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

This is why he argues that his work occupies a place in the margins of philosophy, rather than simply being philosophy per se. The future that Derrida is referring to is hence not just a future that will become present, but the future that makes all ‘presence’ possible and also impossible.

Of Grammatology is a method of investigating the origin of language which enables our concepts of writing to become as comprehensive as our concepts of speech.

In another attempt to explain deconstruction’s treatment of, and interest in oppositions, Derrida has suggested that: Every present, in order to know itself as present, bears the trace of an absent which defines it. Derrida explains that difference is the condition for the opposition of presence and absence. Indeed, to complicate matters, undecidability returns in two discernible forms.


Our predominant mode of being is what he will eventually term the messianic see Section 6in that experience is ,ogocentrism the wait, or more aptly, experience is only when it is deferred. Fordham University Press, Logocentric linguistics proposes that “the immediate and privileged unity which founds significance and the acts of language is the articulated unity of sound and sense within the phonic.


Arche-writing In Of Grammatology and elsewhere, Derrida argues that signification, broadly conceived, always refers to other signs, and that one can never reach a sign that refers only to itself. This page was last edited on 19 Decemberat Deconstructive Strategy Derrida, like many other contemporary European theorists, is preoccupied with undermining the oppositional tendencies that have befallen much of the Western philosophical tradition.

As a consequence we cannot simply ask Derrida to explain exactly what he meant by propounding that enigmatic sentiment that has been translated as “there is nothing outside of the text” OG These terms all have slightly different meanings. There is, therefore, no absolute truth outside of construction no matter how scientific or prolific that construction might be. And this is not just one metaphysical gesture among others, it is the metaphysical exigency, that which has been the most constant, most profound and most potent LI As Derrida suggests, there is a sense derdida which “an aborted interiorisation is at the same time a respect for the other as other” MDM