The Cognitive style of PowerPoint by Edward Tufte. Żaklina Sochacka. 2/20 cognitive adjective formal related to the process of knowing, understanding, and. Edward R. Tufte. The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint: Pitching Out Corrupts Within. Следующий Слайд. [NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE). ANFAli FulhL HET. FOR RE-. Trevor Murphy, Research based methods for using powerpoint, animation, and video for instruction, Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM SIGUCCS fall.
|Published (Last):||15 April 2008|
|PDF File Size:||9.37 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.20 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
That said this is a really odd book. I know other reviewers thought that Tufte rants too much in this text, but I found his insights valuable, powwerpoint with regard to the way presentations are altered by the use of powerpoint due to evidence becoming less prominent. After sitting though many abusive Power Point presentations, I got to thinking there’s got to be a better way and began doing research When I began full-time teaching, I used PowerPoint in many of my classes, put quite a few powedpoint my own PowerPoint presentations online, and even produced PowerPoints for a major textbook publisher.
The format dumbs down information, fashioned poqerpoint like a commercial than a teaching tool. Early in the 21st century, several hundred million copies of Microsoft PowerPoint were turning out trillions of slides each year. Tufte currently resides in Cheshire, Connecticut.
The cognitive style of PowerPoint – Edward R. Tufte – Google Books
Poor examples are used to support points, communism banter is distracting, and pulling quotes out of context does not support any argument. My library Help Advanced Book Search. I’d love to hear both authors thoughts about Twitter if McLuhan was still alive.
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Some of the material, as mentioned, is good, but a lot of it is weak. A standard slide might have a title one level of hierarchya series of dot fognitive a second level of hierarchy and then some sub-dot points a third level.
Presentations are Corrupting per Edward Tufte’s “The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint”
Tufte is starting to rant a bit with this little pamphlet. Tuftea powetpoint emeritus of statistics, graphic design, and political economy at Yale University has been described by The New York Times as “the Leonardo da Vinci of Data”. Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. Account Options Sign in. I think he exaggerates, given how useful PowerPoint presentations have been in the recent history of science.
The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint: Pitching Out Corrupts Within
In it he issues a challenge to everyone who presents information to bring clarity to their presentations and find a better way to use these tools that is currently being practiced.
HardcoverSecond Edition31 pages.
For several hours — with just a brief lunch break lunch not included — the professor held forth on how to communicate visually. That’s what this felt like. Although the evidence did not truly suggest the shuttle would be fine, the takeaway from reading the PowerPoints edwafd that everything would be OK. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. I was never called upon to present one myself.
The answer is, I should expect my son to come up with some valuable information and transfer it to his audience for me, I’m a pretty blank slate here. He bends quotes to his will such as quoting Orwell and then misquoting him to make him talk dognitive PowerPoint.
I wish I could rant with such clarity. Jan 27, Lizzie rated it really liked it Shelves: Your email address will not be published. This is an amazing book on the problems of presentation style made possible by PP.
My soon-to-be brother-in-law showed me how, by creating 5 or 6 slides expounding why this one guy where he was temping at Edwarc Worldcom was a edwagd bastard.
Apr 27, Alexander Fontana rated it liked it Shelves: However, PowerPoint can be used well and can be a remarkably good learning tool. For example, the resolution is very low in PowerPoint presentations. PP convenience for the speaker can be costly to both conten YES!
The one thing that I think Tufte does not address directly enough is the audience’s willingness syyle be stupefied and led by PP yielding messiahs. All presentation styles do.