Kate Crehan An introduction to the concept of culture in Gramsci’s writing of culture and the links between culture and power in relation to anthropology. BOOK REVIEWS Gramsci, Culture, and Anthropology. By Kate Crehan. Berkeley: Uni sity of California Press, Pp. x, $ cloth, $ paper. Download Citation on ResearchGate | On Dec 1, , Les Field and others published Gramsci, Culture, and Anthropology Kate Crehan }.
|Published (Last):||11 November 2004|
|PDF File Size:||5.38 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.76 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
My library Help Advanced Book Search.
“Hegemonizing” Gramsci: on Kate Crehan’s Gramsci, Culture and Anthropology by Greg Meyerson
So that strictly speaking there is no difference between the two. Kate Crehan makes extensive use of Gramsci’s own writings, including his preprison journalism and prison letters as well as the prison notebooks.
The annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association AAAattended by over 6, people from all over the world, featured several packed meetings about the occupation kaye Iraq and the ethics of anthropological engagement with anthropologj US military. Intellectuals and the Production of Culture. Unity must be forged on the right basis and for Gramsci and Crehan, this basis is the conventional Marxist one of class interest.
Some Assumptions Part II: Anthropology Through a Double Lens: How does a historicist judge between them?
Such knowledge—always organically linked to the structural realities of class—is a central element in the reproduction or transformation of any regime of crean. The Problem of Historicism I have spent some significant time on this relatively modest book because I think it contributes to the very important project of strengthening class analysis.
Putting “culture” into context
She is the author of a number of works including Gramsci, Culture and Anthropology Pluto, But this notion is nothing to celebrate and interestingly in conflict with the anthropological concept. Thus, what is true becomes what is really yours, with no criterion for collective self-recognition beyond being in tune with the essence of an era-which offers no criterion at all since this essence cannot be defined apart from class consciousness, just is class consciousness.
Realism facilitates this deeper process of mutual recognition and understanding. Gramsci on Graksci 4. Gramsci’s Life and Work 3. Inequality and Its Narrativeswill enable cultural studies scholars, in particular, to consider new ways to think beyond the paradigm for the interrelation of class and culture offered by Raymond Williams and E.
This is a serious omission because the affiliated epistemological problems threaten to undermine the defense of class to which Crehan is rightly committed. Gramsci, Culture and Anthropology also provides an account of the intellectual and political contexts within which he was writing.
Gramsci, Culture and Anthropology
The version of multiculturalism that demands a suspension of judgment on purely a priori grounds [Mohanty is also atnhropology critiquing the bounded whole view in anthropology] offers us at best a weak pluralist image of noninterference and peaceful coexistence which is based on the abstract notion that everything about the other culture is equally valuable. Crehan argues with conviction that there is much in Gramsci that should be of value to anthropologists.
Gramsci, Race, and The Politics of Interpretation. For example one among manythe U. Crehan nevertheless criticizes this work for its— now canonical— emphasis o n race class and gender as co-primary intersecting elements of identity:.
Gramsci, Culture and Anthropology – Kate Crehan – Google Books
She traces most citations of Gramsci in anthropology to the interpretations by cultural historian Raymond Williams and the anthropologists John and Jean Comaroff. Crehan examines the challenge that Gramsci’s approach poses to common anthropological assumptions about the nature of “culture” as well as the potential usefulness of Gramsci’s writings for contemporary anthropologists. An additional irony is that Althusser defines theory in much the same way that Gramsci defines revolutionary ideology-in terms of their coherence.
As critics have noted, such a view, while claiming to unite theory and practice seriously impoverishes the former. GramsciCultureand Anthropology is a welcome contribution to the revival of interest in the work of Antonio Gramsci.
Reading Gramsci Joseph A. The AAA has now voted in favour of a change in its ethics code that specifically draws a line between legitimate anthropological research and spying for the military.
Metropolitan Books,p. Sociology of the suicide bomber.
He has recently completed a book manuscript tentatively titled, Culture and Tactics: Most Marxists rightly understand the future as emerging dialectically out of the potentialities of the present. He refused to romanticize the peasant because his goal was to help draw the peasantry to self-consciousness, to class consciousness, the substance of a renewed common sense marked by critical thought.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4. It of course underlies any clash of civilization paradigm.
Inequality and Its Narratives. From edition Issue 3. In the last year he published his first book, Collectivities: His work has become one of the most cited sources on power and hegemony.
As is well known, Thompson did not find it useful to define this structural domination in terms of base and superstructure, with its problematic privileging of economy over culture. Selected pages Title Page. In cultute last twenty years Antonio Gramsci has become a major presence in British and American anthropology, especially for anthropologists working on issues of culture and power.
Extensive use is made of Gramsci’s own writings, including his pre-prison journalism and prison letters as well as the prison notebooks. Gramsci, Culture and Anthropology also provides an account of the intellectual and political contexts within which he was writing. What I am suggesting then is that the failure to sustain a plausible concept of truth undermines a cogent theorizing of the notion of objective interest in an emancipated future, which in turn should be the basis for class consciousness.