LA Rivoluzione Dimenticata (Italian Edition) [Lucio Russo] on * FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Get Instant Access to La Rivoluzione Dimenticata. Il Pensiero Pensiero Scientifico Greco E La Scienza Moderna By Lucio Russo pdf. La Rivoluzione. Lucio Russo (born 22 November ) is an Italian physicist, mathematician and historian of Born in BC and Why It Had to Be Reborn (Italian: La rivoluzione dimenticata), Russo promotes the belief that Hellenistic science in the period.

Author: Tazil Mojora
Country: Georgia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Music
Published (Last): 19 September 2014
Pages: 130
PDF File Size: 6.94 Mb
ePub File Size: 12.70 Mb
ISBN: 873-8-24665-984-6
Downloads: 18157
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Nerisar

He rivolhzione in mass purges and expulsions of all intellectuals. First, I think Russo puts too much stress on a single period. From Roman times right through the 17th cen- tury, throughout the history of Mediterranean and European civilizations, to do science was to study Greeks. Yet the play of the history of Western science was not entirely episodic. Russo bases his argument on an interpretation of the scientific method.

La Rivoluzione Dimenticata

Help Center Find new research papers in: In L’ America dimenticataRusso suggests that the Americas were known to some European civilizations in ancient times, probably discovered by the Phoenicians or the Carthaginiansbut that the knowledge was lost under Roman expansion in the 2nd century BCE. Briefly, I find his dismissal of non-Hellenistic science unmotivated. Click here to sign up. Hypothetico-deductive science may have its roots in Greece—but the roots are tan- gled, as it were, leading to surprising places such as pure mathematics, speculative medicine, and rhetoric.

Among his main areas of interest are Gibbs measure of the Fivoluzione modelpercolation theorylucii and finite Bernoulli schemes, within which he proved russk approximate version of the classical Kolmogorov’s zero—one law. This did not have empirical realizations, and it merely anticipated the achievements of the Hellenistic world in math- ematical reasoning.

Remember me on this computer.

Perhaps, then, the scientific revolution consisted just in this: From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. La rivoluzione dimenticataRusso promotes the belief that Hellenistic science in the period — BC reached heights not achieved by Classical age science, and proposes that it went further than ordinarily thought, in multiple fields not normally associated with ancient science.

  CARDAX 6000 PDF

Wikiquote has quotations related to: In the history of science, he has reconstructed some contributions of the Hellenistic astronomer Hipparchusthrough the analysis of his surviving works, and the proof of heliocentrism attributed by Plutarch to Seleucus of Seleucia and studied the history of theories of tides [3]from the Hellenistic to modern age.

Hellenistic science was focused on the city of Alexandria. The community of historians of math- ematics should be dimenticaat for Russo for this achievement, and should hope that the book gets quickly translated into other major rivoluzionr.

Second, Russo is right, I think, to highlight a di,enticata that was largely overlooked by the scholarship—that is, how exactly did Greek science get forgotten? Log In Sign Up. Some structure might, and therefore should, be discerned in it.

University of Rome Tor Vergata.

By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. A truly forgotten revolution! This was not West- ern Europe of the 16th—17th centuries, but the eastern Mediterranean of the third century B. It will serve as excellent reading in a survey of the history of science, besides of course offering an important thesis, well worth our critical attention.

Certainly not at the so-called scientific revolution—which merely brought back to life the Hellenistic methods it knew from its literary sources. Third and finally, whatever we may think of the narrative Russo offers for the entire his- tory of Western science, I feel we ought to applaud him for offering it. In The Forgotten Revolution: We should try to explain how this has happened and, thanks to Russo, the problem may now be addressed.

When we give an etymology for a word we hardly ever explain its real meaning, past or present, as such meanings depend on a synchronic network of connotations.

  BUILD AND PILOT YOUR OWN WALKALONG GLIDERS PDF

Views Read Edit View history. Knotentheorie, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, Vol. In fact, so Russo claims with great persuasive vigor, we have forgotten the true time and place this revolution took place. While something profound clearly changed roughly between the fifth and the fourth centuries B.

He also concludes that the 17th-century scientific revolution in Europe was due in large part to the recovery of Hellenistic science.

La rivoluzione dimenticata. Il pensiero scientifico greco e la scienza moderna

The same principle holds for intellectual achievements, yet Russo to exaggerate a little reads Archimedes almost as if he was the contemporary of Popper. Somehow, a process of forgetting must have occurred in between. We simply cannot date much ancient science with any accuracy.

In other projects Wikiquote. Thanks to Russo, we may begin to think through such issues: Zur Geschichte epistemischer Dinge. But what if the very same things change their meanings according to their contexts?

Lucio Russo – Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre

Il pensiero scientifico greco e la scienza moderna. Retrieved from ” https: Indeed, Russo cannot be much wrong in ascribing a major role, in this play, to the Greeks. For this shift in general, see [Saito ]. In- deed, it is not totally far-fetched to detect a hypothetico-deductive science in some works by Archimedes though even there I tend to see a more purely abstract mathematical thinkingBut taken in their lufio context, such works belonged to a wider domain of dimwnticata writings.

Nor later than the third century B. Indeed—crucially—the works of Archimedes meant to ancient readers something different from what they meant to, say, Galileo.