A new printing of Steven Youell’s lecture notes, originally from * The Card Trick That The Hacker Stack A new idea in memorized stack work. Powerful. is this still available from Steven Youell? For a while, the “Hacker Stack” was offered as a free download, but that offer has long since been. Originally Posted by Steven Youell I use Si Stebbins as a Called it the Hacker Stack and published around 15 years ago. So you shuffle into.
|Published (Last):||24 October 2005|
|PDF File Size:||10.79 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.50 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
So in the end, it’s a cyclical memorized deck. What would make you happy? Youell is becoming increasingly unpleasant due to his unfettered ability to to send visible and invisible PM attacks. If you have an opportunity to see the dvd demo or to see Mickey in person he’s making the convention roundsdon’t pass it by. This is just soooo good.
Or better still, just buy these dvds to simply enjoy Michael’s routines. I am not saying that such behavior is excused by a low number of instances, but I am saying that you cannot provide such evidence. Oh, and surely it’s far better to memorize a deck that’s easy to set up than a random deck. Failed filename Unsupported photo file type. I’m not sure if that is in print or even if is it his own method, but it was pretty sweet. Many features may not work properly without it. There are some routines I do which use the Si Stebbins Stack.
Steven Youell is giving me a demo of his Mongrel pass. You can say anything you want– even yell at me.
My favorite But you will be deprived of the many built in effects that stacks like Aronson provide, and you will never match the speed that users of TRUE memorized decks can achieve. I supported your efforts by buying a copy of Quicker Stack from you and it was worth every penny to study it and to follow your thinking and to marvel at your ingenuity.
A few more faros and I’m back to my starting stack. My question is this: He frequently journeys to and performs magic in Little Egypt, the local name for extreme southern Illinois, where the stxck bear such names as Cairo, Thebes, and Karnak.
I constantly try to engage YOU in a flame war? I know there are people who use it– just can’t think of a specific name. Coming from a cafe moderator with years of experience with the situation, I would consider that’s pretty substantial evidence you are treated ‘differently’ to say the least. It will take time and indeed a very magical and visual transformation to re-establish trust with those affected. Additionally, I will go on record as stating that the number steevn people who believe and have evidence that I am not the person you portray me to be is exponential to any number you can provide that believe me to be the person you portray me to be.
As of right now, the only people I am aware of that have problems with me are you, Andrew and Tyler.
Si Stebbins – The Magician’s Forum
I do not like you. I think that would be fair. I a recently talking to a few people who would like to share certain emails with this man. But I’ve said enough about that.
You say you want open debate as well, but wouldn’t do it on the cafe, so why would you expect me to do it there? Although I was careful on the ordering page to hscker “nearly all my commercial offerings”, I obviously did not do that in my signature on the Cafe. You can share with your family why it is you travel to Boca Raton or Snowmass or conventions.
I have no doubt that you know more than me but I also think I have valuable things to say and share with fellow magicians and have a right to be on a discussion forum. In short, I’m very much a beginner. What do you want me to do? I’ve read the two statements you quoted in your last post several times and I simply don’t tthe how any of them are contradictory. To me, sequential stacks based on rules or algorithms and doggerel verses are not memorized stacks.
Most of those times, the cost ends up being that some may actually believe his non-sense.
So let’s deal with different facts that contradict you. That is unfortunate, but again, if you change your mind, please let me know.
Therefore I get the advantages of both. When you’re anonymous no one can really check to see if you know what you’re talking about. I believe that Michael Skinner did something that was very similar to what you’ve described. Steven Keyl Inner circle Washington, D. You just glimpse, employ the incredibly simple system and you’ve got it.
Loomis has been extremely gracious and we’ve been communicating via PM regarding this stuff. You copied and pasted my words over there. I know more about magic than you do. I have expressed regret for the mistakes I have made and I have offered to reconcile not only with you, but also with anyone of the people you claim I have offended. Thanks Rudy, I’ve emailed him via the forum. I hope the recording survived. I regret a few of them; a few of them were taken out of context and some of them were in response to messages you sent that you did not publish.
Their only reason for deleting your post was because it referenced mine. I discovered that there are only two places where you can safely ribbon spread the deck face up and show a random mixture. Simon Aronson did exactly that when he created his particular stack. Well, mine are even worse!